Carriage Fleet Strategy and Standard Rake Consist
Believe it or not, there is a vague strategy to what we do in C&W! We do get buffeted by events from time to time so inevitably plans change, but the overarching direction of travel will hopefully remain the same. Seeing as we've had some comments questioning why the rakes have been mixed up a bit recently, our Head of Department Ian has explained what it's all about. Over to Ian....
****************
Historically, GWSR have run
three rakes of seven carriages with rakes 1 and 2 running throughout the season
and 3 or more rakes running for Race Trains and Galas only. Each rake has been
formed of a combination of open and compartment stock together with a brake
vehicle and where possible, a catering vehicle and an accessible carriage but
otherwise there has been no consistency between individual rakes in the
formation/type of vehicles.
Our Standard Rake Consist strategy is intended, over a period of time, to achieve three interchangeable rakes of seven carriages with as near as possible identical formations. These will be the formation supporting our current commercial business model. This will enable rakes to be regularly rotated out of service during the Running Season such that:
- Routine inspections, planned maintenance and reactive repairs can be planned and undertaken throughout the year thereby reducing the workload during Annual Winter Maintenance and improving the overall customer experience of riding in our carriages
- Tyre and brake wear will be more even across the rakes
- Reserve vehicles can be substituted into rakes more easily allowing vehicles to be brought into the works for planned refurbishment
- Commercial activity is unaffected
The current agreed standard formation of each rake is as
follows:
North
TSO
SK/FK or CK
FO (or SO
upgraded to First Class)
Catering
Vehicle (RBr or RMB which is subject to RCS On-Train Catering Strategy)
Brake/Accessible
Vehicle
TSO
SK or FK
South
Factors taken into account in formulating the above
formation were:
·
Retention of mixed open/compartment
vehicles to optimize the passenger experience
·
Overall seat capacity and thus loading
per rake
·
Seating configurations to take
account of group bookings (which prefer TSOs so that a large group can be
seated together)
· The number of available toilets per rake (note any toilets immediately behind the loco are locked out at both ends, so we have sought to ensure that the vehicles at the extreme North and South ends do not have toilets at the end of the rake)
Spot the odd one out! |
To achieve the current agreed
formations across all three rakes, we need the following vehicles by type:
Qty.6 x TSO
Qty.6 x SK/FK
or CK
Qty.3 x FO
(or SO upgraded to First Class)
Qty.3 x Catering
Vehicle (RBr or RMB which is subject to RCS On-Train Catering Strategy)
Qty.3 x Brake
The above
totals must include at least 3 Accessible Vehicles
To
facilitate planned refurbishments and removal from service for operational
reasons, a reserve fleet will be required comprising a minimum of:
Qty.1 x TSO
Qty.1 x SK/FK
or CK
Qty.1 x FO
(or SO upgraded to First Class)
Qty.1 x
Catering Vehicle (RBr or RMB which is subject to RCS On-Train Catering
Strategy)
Qty.1 x
Brake/Accessible Vehicle
The vehicles
in the reserve fleet will also be available to supplement Race Trains and to form
a fourth rake for Galas.
Combining
both the operational and reserve fleets will require a minimum total fleet
comprising:
Qty.7 x TSO
Qty.7 x SK/FK
or CK
Qty.4 x FO
(or SO upgraded to First Class)
Qty.5 x
Catering Vehicle (RBr or RMB which is subject to RCS On-Train Catering
Strategy)
Qty.5 x
Brake/Accessible Vehicle
As can be seen from the table below (GWSR Carriage Fleet @ April 2024), we are in a position to achieve the desired Standard Rake Consist without necessarily incurring any acquisitions albeit to fulfil our long-term requirement will require investment in the restoration of some vehicles.
GWSR Carriage Fleet @ April 2024
Vehicle Group |
Vehicle Type |
Vehicle No. |
Accessible |
Owner |
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open Carriages –
Qty.11 in total |
|||||
Qty.1 |
FO |
3132 |
|
GWSR |
|
Qty.3 |
SO |
4787 |
|
GWSR |
|
SO |
4790 |
X |
GWSR |
|
|
SO |
4798 |
|
GWSR |
To be upgraded to
(GWSR First Class) |
|
Qty.7 |
TSO |
4614 |
X |
GWSR |
|
TSO |
4763 |
|
GWSR |
|
|
TSO |
4772 |
|
GWSR |
|
|
TSO |
4867 |
|
GWSR |
Awaiting
restoration |
|
TSO |
4986 |
|
GWSR |
|
|
TSO |
5023 |
|
GWSR |
|
|
TSO |
5042 |
|
Private |
|
|
Compartment
Carriages – Qty. 11 in total |
|||||
Qty.2 |
CK |
16195 |
|
Private |
|
CK |
16221 |
|
Private |
|
|
Qty.3 |
FK |
13326 |
|
Private |
|
FK |
13329 |
|
Private |
|
|
FK |
13337 |
|
Private |
|
|
Qty.6 |
SK |
24006 |
|
Private |
Awaiting restoration |
SK |
24804 |
|
Private |
On loan from NYMR |
|
SK |
24949 |
|
GWSR |
|
|
SK |
25341 |
|
GWSR |
|
|
SK |
25451 |
|
GWSR |
|
|
SK |
25488 |
|
Private |
On loan from NYMR |
|
Brake Vehicles –
Qty.5 in total |
|||||
Qty.2 |
BCK |
21092 |
|
Private |
|
BCK |
21272 |
|
Private |
On loan from
April 2024 |
|
Qty.2 |
BSO |
9000 |
X |
GWSR |
|
BSO |
34929 |
X |
GWSR |
|
|
Qty.1 |
BSK |
35808 |
X |
GWSR |
|
Catering Vehicles
– Qty.5 in total |
|||||
Qty.3 |
RBr |
1672 |
|
GWSR |
|
RBr |
1675 |
|
GWSR |
|
|
RBr |
1965 |
|
GWSR |
Awaiting
restoration |
|
Qty.2 |
RMB |
1808 |
|
GWSR |
|
RMB |
1876 |
|
GWSR |
|
In the short term, this will mean that rakes will not
be in a single livery; however, we are producing a plan for some repaints that
will alleviate this issue over the longer term.
This Strategy will take a number of years to implement
with completion influenced by the availability of funding and, as important, the
availability of volunteer resource and our overall ‘productivity’. Any acquisition
and disposal of carriages will be considered on a case by case basis as the
Strategy progresses. In 2024 we have implemented Phase 1 of the strategy which
has Rake 1 broadly unchanged from its previous season consist (in order that we
can meet commercial business needs) whilst Rakes 2 and 3 are now broadly
identical in consist.
Isn't there a couple of errors in the "Minimum Total Fleet" numbers? We only need 4 catering coaches and 4 brake coaches (not 5 for each), so a total of 26 coaches (not 28)?
ReplyDeleteUnsure what the error is there in the inconsistency, however 4 brake coaches is arguably running a bit tight - we need four brakes in use for the May Steam gala and July diesel gala. So either we're restricted to doing major work on a brake coach for no more than 9 months or we negatively impact those events. Neither is ideal. Not an issue for catering coaches though, no particular need to have catering on all 4 trains.
DeleteJust a thought re catering coaches. The RBr take a very long time to restore, so by the time the last is restored the first will be back in for at least a major overhaul.
DeleteI did a lot of this sort of planning back in the day, we applied a criticality factor, ie no brake vehicle = no train, no SK train runs but a bit more crowded. So I don't fault the thinking that "we need to have an additional spare brake and catering vehicle" If a failure occurs to one of these during the day and your only spare is under maintenance you can have big problems. We used to call such vehicles (and similar spare parts) critical spares.
DeleteMalcolm (late CM&EE Dept C&W section Chief Inspector)
Jon Bribie Island in the Land of OZ - really appreciate the facts, thank you for that. Keep up the good work especially with the RBr's aka 'never ending story'. Happydaze 11/04/24 @ 05:00LT
ReplyDeleteLooking at the list of corridor coaches, the GWSR seems to be reliant on privately owned coaches to make up the shortfall in the required numbers needed for the total fleet, as listed in the article. What happens if the owners decide to remove them?
ReplyDeleteA Pettifer
Whilst I won't go into too much detail in public, we are satisfied that that risk is low for various reasons, agreements are in place and several are owned by very long-standing departmental volunteers.
DeleteDear Alex, thanks for your reply. I fully understand that the arrangements that the GWSR have with the private owners shouldn't be discussed in public. I just felt that the imbalance between GWSR ownership and private ownership for corridor stock might cause a problem if the GWSR had to rely on its own stock. I assume that there may be very long-term aspirations to purchase some of the private coaches.
DeleteA Pettifer
Excellent blog post thank you very much. Is there a plan to replace the NYMR coaches when they have to return ?
ReplyDeleteExcellent item - many thanks for sharing this.
ReplyDelete